Why does the writer refer to ‘act’ as more important than ‘absorb’ or ‘learn’?

Class 12th English Core, Question - Why does the writer refer to ‘act’ as more important than ‘absorb’ or ‘learn’?

By
Komal Kohli
-

Question 22:Why does the writer refer to ‘act’ as more important than ‘absorb’ or ‘learn’?

The correct answer is :Without more context, it is difficult to say exactly why the writer considers “act” to be more important than “absorb” or “learn.” However, the writer might be making this statement based on the belief that knowledge and learning are only truly valuable if they are put into practice. In other words, the writer may believe that the act of applying what one has learned is more critical to personal growth and development than simply acquiring information.

For example, a person could spend years studying a subject and absorbing vast amounts of information, but if they do not put that knowledge into practice, it may not have much impact on their life or others. On the other hand, if someone takes what they have learned and uses it to create change, solve problems, or make a difference, then that knowledge has real value and significance.

It’s also possible that the writer is emphasizing the importance of taking action over simply learning for the purpose of inspiring and motivating their audience. They may believe that encouraging people to take action, rather than just passively absorbing information, is more likely to lead to positive results.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR