First, interviews are often subjective, as they are dependent on the perspective and biases of both the interviewer and the interviewee. Interviewers may ask questions in a way that leads the interviewee to provide a specific type of answer, while interviewees may be motivated to present themselves in a certain light or withhold information for their own reasons.
Second, the accuracy of an interview is also dependent on the interviewee’s willingness and ability to be truthful. Some interviewees may not have all the information about a subject or may deliberately misrepresent the facts in order to protect their interests or maintain their image.
Third, the editing process for interviews can also impact the accuracy and reliability of the information presented. Interviews may be edited or condensed to focus on certain aspects of the conversation, which could result in important information being left out or the overall tone of the interview being changed.
Therefore, it can be argued that while interviews have the potential to provide valuable insights and information, it is an excessive claim to suggest that they are a foolproof source of truth.
