Differentiate between Zamindari system and Raiyatwari system with regard to the consequence on agricultural prosperity.

Question 10:Differentiate between Zamindari system and Raiyatwari system with regard to the consequence on agricultural prosperity.

The correct answer is – The Zamindari system and Raiyatwari system were two different land tenure systems that were prevalent in India during the colonial period. The consequences of these systems on agricultural prosperity were different.

1. Zamindari system: Under the Zamindari system, the land belonged to the Zamindars who were intermediaries between the British government and the peasants. The Zamindars had the right to collect revenue from the peasants in exchange for providing them with protection and security. However, the Zamindars often exploited the peasants by charging high rents and imposing arbitrary taxes. This led to the impoverishment of the peasants and a decline in agricultural productivity.

2. Raiyatwari system: Under the Raiyatwari system, the land belonged to the cultivators or Raiyats who were the direct tenants of the British government. The Raiyats had the right to cultivate the land and pay a fixed revenue to the government. This system gave more security and autonomy to the peasants, as they had control over the land they cultivated. This led to a greater sense of ownership and responsibility among the peasants, which in turn led to higher levels of agricultural productivity.

Therefore, the consequence of the Zamindari system on agricultural prosperity was negative, as it led to exploitation and impoverishment of the peasants, and a decline in agricultural productivity. In contrast, the Raiyatwari system had a positive consequence on agricultural prosperity, as it gave more security and autonomy to the peasants, and led to higher levels of agricultural productivity.